This question seemed riveting to Dilyara, though she tries to explain why she is wary of such innovations.
I think that
the issue is not only thought-provoking but also important as the choice
between two ways of teaching (in a native language or in an international
language) influences the whole process of education. So will it be a good idea
to have lessons in English?
In my opinion, subjects should be
taught in a native language, Russian in our occasion, as I see it rather
problematic to understand everything about the topic not only at first but
during the whole time of studying in the second way. And the fact that it can
be difficult for pupils to understand notions, some extracts of the topic even
in a native language (otherwise, there would be more students with excellent
grades, not counting those who are not interested in getting knowledge) makes
me feel so. Moreover, if the lessons are held in English, we won't use our
language often but it's a great part of our life, culture and history of Russia
which is an independent and distinctive country.
But another group of people would
like to have lessons in English as they find it a perfect way to learn the
language as everyday listening and speaking practice is very useful. Besides,
it gives students new priceless experience.
Although the arguments of opponents
are sensible, I still believe that learning subjects in a mother tongue is the
best way for pupils to have good knowledge. Speaking about the second way, I
find it great for schools where English is a major subject.
Finally, I'd like to confirm my
point of view on the issue and I think that a person's choice directly depends
on his personality and life goals.
No comments:
Post a Comment